The approval of Flow tDCS gets a closer look
STUDY: Klaus J et al, Lancet Psychiatry 2026
STUDY TYPE: Expert commentary
FUNDING: Independent
Background
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates brain activity with a low electrical current applied to the scalpy. On December 8, 2025, the US FDA approved home-based tDCS device (Flow FL-100) for moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder. This Lancet Psychiatry commentary argues the evidence doesn’t justify it.
The Problems
- The approval rests on a single randomized controlled trial of 173 patients.
- The blind failed in the trial, with 78% of patients guessing their treatment correctly. More concerning, the benefit disappeared when researchers controlled for treatment beliefs, suggesting the unblinding gave a false positive read on the device.
- There are another 30+ trials of tDCS in depression, but meta-analysis of home-based tDCS found a Hedges’ g of just 0.10 (Aiken’s note: true, but another analysis landed at 0.24-0.46).
- The device as sold also limits sessions to twice weekly after week 3, whereas the trial used three sessions per week — meaning the approved real-world protocol differs from the one that generated the data.
Practice Implications
- FDA approval does not mean what it used to.
- On the one hand, tDCS has 30 years of support from clinical trials numbering over 30.
- On the other hand, the data is not as robust as it is for older FDA approvals, and tDCS does not bring any benefit when antidepressants fail.
— Chris Aiken, MD
Director, Psych Partners
Editor in Chief, Carlat Psychiatry Report








2 comments
Hiten Soni
April 26, 2026 at 12:35 pm
Please know that FDA did not approve tDCS. It cleared it. Clearance has different standards than approval.
TMS is also not “Approved “ it is “cleared”.
Please verify it with actual FDA verbiage.
Just sayin.
Chris Aiken, MD
April 26, 2026 at 2:10 pm
That’s a common misunderstanding – tDCS is approved, TMS is cleared – but you are correct the evidence is better for TMS. The FDA is not as reliable as it once kinda was!
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X25004231