Leo Kanner usually gets the credit for discovering autism in the 1940’s, but Russian psychiatrist Grunya Sukhareva described it 20 years before him
Autism has been misclassified, misunderstood, and redefined for nearly three centuries, and we still don’t have it right
STUDY: Pierucka M et al, History of Psychology 2026;29(1):20–30
STUDY TYPE: Review
FUNDING: Independent
Background
The paper traces the evolution of autism from:
- Before 1980: A rare childhood disorder with narrow criteria
- 1980-2013: Broader category with multiple subtypes, in children and adults
- 2013-present: A spectrum encompassing a wide range of conditions
Early Roots: Before DSM-III
1749
In one of the earliest descriptions, patient HB had impairments in language, eye contact, and social relationships. He was lacked tact and engaged in repetitive behaviors, always sitting in the same seat in church. His diagnosis with “silent madness” prompted legal troubles: his marriage was annulled, and his inheritance was lost to his brother.
1911
Eugen Bleuler coins the term “autism”, but as a feature of schizophrenia (withdrawal into inner life).
1920s
Grunya Sukhareva describes children with autistic traits using the term “schizoid psychopathy.”
1943
Leo Kanner publishes the first formal description of “infantile autism.” He distinguishes autism from schizophrenia by its early onset, “extreme aloneness,” and insistence on sameness. His descriptions resemble those of Dr. Sukhareva, but he does not reference her.
1944
Hans Asperger describes a milder form of autism, emphasizing social deficits with intact intelligence and restricted interests.
1960s–70s
Autism is seen as a reaction to cold, “refrigerator mothers,” and idea refuted by Rimland in his 1964 book Infantile Autism.
1970s
Research by Rutter, Kolvin, Chess establishes autism as separate from schizophrenia, with an earlier onset and unique neurological and comorbid features (eg, higher rates of epilepsy, something not seen in schizophrenia). Kolvin and colleagues looked at early-onset versus later-onset disorders and found that children with schizophrenia tended to have family histories of schizophrenia, while those with autism did not.
Official Recognition: DSM-III and Beyond
1980
DSM-III is first edition of DSM to recognize autism as a unique disorder, listed under “Pervasive Developmental Disorders.” They call it “infantile autism” with criteria emphasizing:
-
-
- Early onset (before 30 months)
- Social, communication, and behavioral impairments
- Explicit exclusion of schizophrenia features
-
The criteria were more narrow and rigid criteria than today’s, and focused on early childhood, with no adult description.
1987
DSM-III-R broadens the concept, removing “infantile” from the title and defining it with three domains:
-
-
- Social interaction
- Communication
- Restricted/repetitive behaviors
-
1994
DSM-IV expands the pervasive developmental category to include:
-
-
- Autistic disorder
- Asperger’s disorder
- Rett’s disorder
- Childhood disintegrative disorder
-
2013
DSM-5 brings the pervasive developmental categories into a single diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
For the first time, this DSM allows autism and ADHD to be diagnosed together.
ICD-11 follows with a similar spectrum model, adding sensory processing issues, such as over- or under-responsiveness to sounds, sights, smells, tastes, or touch.
Looking Back
In 1988, Rutter and Schopler wrote that autism had the most validated diagnosis in child psychiatry. And yet, each subsequent revision made major changes that called that confidence into question. The history of autism is partly a history of psychiatry’s overconfidence — in our categories, our theories, and our ability to distinguish one presentation from another.
The prevalence has risen roughly twentyfold since the 1990’s, and we still don’t have a biomarker or criteria that everyone agrees on.
Practice Implications
Diagnostic criteria change, but one thing remains constant. Severity and functional impairment are what separates a disorder from a trait.
— Chris Aiken, MD
Director, Psych Partners
Editor in Chief, Carlat Psychiatry Report








One comment
Michele Fornaro
June 4, 2026 at 6:22 am
This is a valuable insight. The severity may decrease because the ASD now encompasses a much larger number of conditions compared to what the classic, boundary Autism diagnosis originally did, including many individuals with lower baseline severity in terms of hampered social functioning and quality of life, and yet worth clinical attention. The next question now is:”Where should we set the threshold for ASD worth medical treatment and who is going to benefit from which intervention?”. Thank you!